ChickenBones: A Journal
for Literary & Artistic African-American Themes
Miles conceived these settings only hours before the recording
dates and arrived with sketches which indicated to the group what was
to be played. Therefore, you will hear something close to pure
spontaneity in these performances.
Miles Davis CDs
* * * * *
Kind of Blue: The Revolution Recorded
Music Commentary by Mtume ya Salaam & Kalamu ya Salaam
What Is Jazz? Kind of Blue is the jazz record. If I was asked What is reggae? and I could answer only in records, Id hand over a copy of Bob Marley & The Wailers Natty Dread. If I was asked, What is soul? itd be Marvin Gayes Whats Going On. What is hip-hop? Public Enemys It Takes A Nation Of Millions To Hold Us Back. And, what is jazz? No hesitation, no need to think. Kind of Blue. Easy.
* * * * *
This is the one jazz record owned by people who dont listen to jazz, and with good reason. It was the key recording of what became modal jazz, a music free of the fixed harmonies and forms of pop songs. In Daviss mens hands it was a weightless music, but one that refused to fade into the background. In retrospect every note seems perfect, and each piece moves inexorably towards its destiny.John Szwed, author of So What: The Life of Miles Davis.
* * * * *
Miles Davis Trumpet John Coltrane Tenor Saxophone Julian Cannonball Adderley Alto Saxophone Bill Evans Piano Paul Chambers Bass James Cobb Drums Wynton Kelly Piano on Freddie Freeloader
* * * * *
Still acknowledged as the height of hip four decades after it was recorded, Kind of Blue is the premier album of its era, jazz or otherwise. Its vapory piano-and-bass-phrased introduction is universally recognized. Classical buffs and rage rockers alike praise its subtlety, simplicity and emotional depth. Copies of the album are passed to friends and given to lovers. The album has sold millions of copies around the world, making it the best-selling recording in Miles Daviss catalog and the best-selling classic jazz album ever. Significantly, a large number of those copies were purchased in the past five years, and undoubtedly not just by old-timers replacing worn vinyl: Kind of Blue is even casting its spell on a younger audience more accustomed to the loud-and-fast esthetic of rock and rap. Ashley Kahn, author of Kind of Blue: The Makings of the Miles Davis Masterpiece
* * * * *
The Name Above the Title Its my belief that Miles Dewey Davis is/was the possessor of the prettiest sound to ever come out of any horn any where at any time. That such a statement is completely subjective and just as completely unsupportable in no way lessens my belief in it. That said, its a good thing Miles plays first on all of these tunes, because he gets upstaged repeatedly by not only his tenor saxophonist, the legendary John Coltrane, but also by his alto saxophonist, the underrated dean of the alto saxophone, Cannonball Adderley. Of course, that only stands true if one views the solos as competition. Both Trane and Cannonball have sounds that practically leap out of the speakers; the two sidemen are making statements. Miles, by contrast, is often content to weave himself into the fabric of the overall piece, soloing almost as if hes part of the rhythm section itself. The ballads, however, are an exception. There, Miles playing is every bit as impressive as that of his more fiery counterparts. Coltranes lovely middle solo notwithstanding, Blue in Green is Miles songboth of the trumpeters solos are so pretty theyre almost painful. And Miles work on Flamenco Sketches is no less outstanding. As we all know, Miles was a brilliant bandleader. Blue in Green and Flamenco Sketches provide two examples of his excellence as a soloist.
* * * * *
I think it, Kind of Blue, is a universal epitome of sophistication in music development. Its a forum for a great artist to perform at the peak of their developmentits just something that will endure for hundreds of years, maybe a thousand years.Elvin Jones, legendary jazz drummer.
* * * * *
When Trane Comes In I know every one of Coltranes entrances on this album. To this day, every time one of his solos begin, I sing along with him for the first few notes. I cant help it all of that power combined with all of that grace is too much to resist. I hear the depth and beauty of Coltranes playing, and I want to sound like that, to be like that too. I want some of that brilliance to come not just to me, but from me. Listen closely to the way Tranes solos develop and you can already hear some of what was to come. The breathtaking runs (even on ballads), the guttural wails followed by piercing shrieks; Trane was already in complete command of the entire range of his horn. Hed yet to take Giant Steps (1960), form Impressions (1963) or make A Love Supreme (1964), but the man was already a phenom.
* * * * *
Kind of Blue is a jazz album that has transcended the genre of jazz and become one of a handful of recordings whose very existence changes everything. Listening to this album will immerse you at once in a world that is dark, brooding, sophisticated, very cool, sexy, and languorous. Bottom line is: if you dont have this record in your collection, you dont have a collection.Jazzitude.com
* * * * *
Oh, Cannonball Cannonball is given the thankless task of being the third voice in a band led by the coolest of the cool, the man with the horn, the prettiest-singing man-devil who ever walked the earth, and right beside him, the most beautiful of the beautiful, the love supreme himself, the man who had so much to say that he invented his own language. Faced with competition like that, whats a self-respecting alto player to do?
The answer: just play. Listen to what Cannonball does at the beginning of his solo on So What. Tranes last note has barely faded away; Cannonball, undaunted, jumps in with three long notes, then an agile, scale-climbing flurry which culminates in a piercing high note, and then throws out a gradually-descending series of low notes which he punctuates with bop-ish bursts here and there. The man is one phrase in and hes already put on an alto clinic. And hes letting it be known: there are three horn players on this album, not two. Its Miles, Trane and Cannonball.
* * * * *
Miles conceived these settings only hours before the recording dates and arrived with sketches which indicated to the group what was to be played. Therefore, you will hear something close to pure spontaneity in these performances. The group had never played these pieces prior to the recordings and I think without exception the first complete performance of each was a “take.“Bill Evans, from the original liner notes of Kind of Blue LP
* * * * *
The Rhythm Section One not-so-secret secret about the Kind of Blue recording sessions (and truthfully, this is true about many recording sessions led by Miles Davis) is the musicians were making up most of what they played as they played it. As the band leader, Davis got the composition credit, but when the band showed up that day, Miles gave them only the most perfunctory of instructions, told them theyd be doing everything in one or two takes only, and said, Roll the tape. Given Miles in-studio methodology, those oh so memorable bass lines that Paul Chambers plays on So What and Flamenco Sketches may well be his own. James Cobbs drumming is perfect as well. His job is to create the framework for everyone elsethe only reason you dont notice him more is because you arent supposed to. Meanwhile, over in the piano chair, we find Bill Evans dedicating himself to the quiet art of musical minimalism. On All Blues, Evans plays as if each note is a treasure that he can barely bear to let go. On Flamenco Sketches, Evans economy is even more startling: he begins his solo so slowly that each note seems individualized, like a photograph, like a face. The three horn playerstrumpet, tenor and altoare what we may remember, but the three members of the rhythm sectionbassist, drummer and pianistare just as important to the overall success of this landmark album.
* * * * *
In the church of jazz, Kind of Blue is one of the holy relics. Critics revere it as a stylistic milestone, one of a very few in the long tradition of jazz performance, on equal footing with seminal recordings by Louis Armstrongs Hot Fives and Charlie Parkers bebop quintets. Musicians acknowledge its influence and have recorded hundreds of versions of the music on the album. Record producer, composer, and Davis confidant Quincy Jones hails it as the one album (if that were the limit) that would explain jazz. Ashley Kahn, author of Kind of Blue: The Makings of the Miles Davis Masterpiece
* * * * *
What Is Jazz? Kind of Blue.Mtume ya Salaam
* * * * *
The revolution will not be televised but in jazz, it was recorded. You see, its like this: in jazz the sixties began in 1959. Back in 1959 there was something in the air. Without even a hint of hubris, Ornette Coleman had presciently predicted the shape of jazz of to come and that shape did not need western chords to swing. But if you did want to use chords, Coltrane took extremely giant steps to lead the way forward for saxophonists and jazz innovators. And, of course, with but an insistent, distinctive, insouciant whisper from his horn, Miles completely discarded all previous changes to offer a timeless statement. Not to mention Monks masterful Town Hall recording or Mingus small band epistles recorded on the Columbia label.
Right there, you got the foundation of post-bebop modern jazz. Right there, in 1959, all you will need to know to understand the entire sixties decade. Right there. In one year. 1959. Kind of Blue is the sound of men singing. Both collectively and individually. The solos are sublime. This music makes you think of things. Intimate things. Intimacies you seldom share. Things no one else may know about youthis music knows. What would we sound like if we werent playing their music, if instead we were playing ourselves, revealing, exploring, closing our eyes and describing all that we saw? Such music would definitely have to be kind of blue, for there is no us in America without some blues. Not necessarily all blues, or only blues, but definitely kind of blue. Yes. So this is our music on a cusp about to head on out into the gone-a-sphere, the way out there-ness where we go when we travel the spaceways, flying by the seat of our pants, our hearts as compass, our life experiences as fuel, determine to go where we had not gone before (and you know we been around!). Okay? 1959. Kind of Blue. Nothing was ever the same again. Nevertheless, every time you listen to this, key moments in your life play on your inner eyeballs. Yes. This is the music of self and yes. Self functioning within a collective. Yes to any and all possibilities unfettered by preconceptions. This is jazz!
Mtume, your chronology error offers me the opportunity to argue my preference for Trane over Miles, which is not a judgment that one is better than the other but rather merely a statement of which one appeals to me more than the other. Referring to Trane, you said: “Hed yet to take Giant Steps (1960).” Well, thats a big mistake. The fact is not only was Giant Steps recorded in the same year and the same month as Kind of Blue, Giant Steps was recorded “before” Kind of Blue. Thats right: Trane had already taken Giant Steps before Miles created Kind of Blue. Trane had already won the heavyweight championship and was now about to play PGA championship golf. Giant Steps was the last major development for jazz combos playing on chord changes in modern jazz. Nobody surpassed that statement for playing the changes. Period. Giant Steps was recorded April 1, 1959. Kind of Blue was recorded April 6, 1959. April fool, Trane had been there and done that before Miles. Think about the humongous achievement for this individual to go from the epitome of chordal investigation to no chords at all and to blow the hell out of both sessions. Trane! To (appropriately) use the vernacular: Trane is a motherfucker! Mtume, as you correctly noted every one of Tranes solos on Kind of Blue is a lyrical masterpiece of such stellar quality that when he enters the room you stand up and salute by singing along with the opening notes. Immediately. How does a musician shift gears like that going from the chordal complexity of Giant Steps to the lyrical simplicity of Kind of Blue? You just got finished taking Giant Steps and now youre going to slow down and do a beautiful, graceful slow dance. Oh wow. Youre right, Mtume, solo for solo, Trane is the clear leader on Kind of Blue even though its Miles masterpiece because Miles conceived it and brought together the ingredients, the musicians to make it happen. So Miles does deserve his accolades but think on this: what if Trane had not made the session. What would Kind of Blue have been without Trane? Trane would still have had Giant Steps and Miles, well, look at the albums that came after Trane left Miles. Some great, great music but not until over five years later in 1964 when Wayne was brought into the fold, not until then was Miles able to begin making music that changed the direction of jazz. After Trane left, Miles went back to standards for the most part (and he did it brilliantly no doubt, but it was still standards and not new directions) but Coltrane was slaying dragons right and left, opening new vistas. One more thing to think about: the myth that Kind of Blue was conceived and completed in one recording session in the studio, the myth that the music had not existed like that before, the myth that on that magical day in April the stuff just Topsy-like jumped out full blown. Not so. And guess what? Theres recorded evidence that Miles had not only been thinking through this music, the fact is Miles had already composed and recorded the opening statement, So What. Indeed, it was more than just a recording session, there was a tv broadcast. On April 2, 1959 on The Robert Herridge Theater Show, Miles performed So What with the Gil Evans Orchestra. In the orchestra was John Coltrane, Wynton Kelly, Paul Chambers and Jimmy Cobb. Most deep jazzheads have seen the program but most of us have never connected the dots. Miles and the band, minus Cannonball, recorded So What four days before the Kind of Blue session. And not only that, So What was recorded within the context of the Gil Evans orchestra. The song had been arranged. Miles had heard all kinds of possibilities plus Trane had played the song before. You see, Kind of Blue is indeed a major, if not (arguably) the major jazz recording of all time, but Kind of Blue was not an instant masterpiece that just happened without any forethought on the part of Miles and other band members. I know this is a lot to think about, so take your time. Whether you get on the Trane or continue traveling with Miles is not even the question. Im just saying recognize that we are talking about a period in the history of the music when history was being made right and left, a period when all the great creators was great creating! (Oh, yeah, guess when Dave Brubeck recorded the Time Out album with the hit song “Take Five” on it? (No, dont do it, Kalamu, dont hurt em.) It was 1959. I say it again: 1959. It was a hell of a year for music.
Kalamu ya Salaam
* * * * *
Food for thought Hmmm. Definitely food for thought. I knew about The Shape Of Jazz To Come and Ive read about Miles irritation that he was, in a way, upstaged by Ornettes album (as much by the title as by the music). Miles always had one eye on history. He knew he was doing something revolutionary, something new. He wanted to be alone on that mountain.
Obviously, he wasnt.
What I didnt know was how many revolutionary (musically) jazz albums dropped during that same year. And no, I didnt know that Trane recorded Giant Steps a mere week before he played on the Kind Of Blue sessions. Thats almost too much to believe, honestly. The man is peerless.
And on the whole Miles v. Trane thing, I dont think its about arguing over who is “better.” By almost any standard of musicianship, Trane was the more complete musician. It doesnt take a jazzhead to recognize that. To me, it simply comes down to a matter of taste. And it certainly isnt a mutually exclusive choice. Meaning, I like my Miles records and I like my Trane records. But if I can only keep the music of one jazz artist, Im going to choose Miles. Hey, look at it this way: if I keep my Miles records, I get Trane and Miles. Unless Kalamu is about to spring another surprise on me, it doesnt work the other way around.
Hey, Baba. Thanks as always for the insight. Im out!Mtume ya Salaam
posted 30 September 2007
* * * * *
#1 – Justify My Thug by Wahida Clark #2 – Flyy Girl by Omar Tyree #3 – Head Bangers: An APF Sexcapade by Zane #4 – Life Is Short But Wide by J. California Cooper #5 – Stackin’ Paper 2 Genesis’ Payback by Joy King #6 – Thug Lovin’ (Thug 4) by Wahida Clark #7 – When I Get Where I’m Going by Cheryl Robinson #8 – Casting the First Stone by Kimberla Lawson Roby #9 – The Sex Chronicles: Shattering the Myth by Zane
#10 – Covenant: A Thriller by Brandon Massey
#11 – Diary Of A Street Diva by Ashley and JaQuavis
#12 – Don’t Ever Tell by Brandon Massey
#13 – For colored girls who have considered suicide by Ntozake Shange
#14 – For the Love of Money : A Novel by Omar Tyree
#15 – Homemade Loves by J. California Cooper
#16 – The Future Has a Past: Stories by J. California Cooper
#17 – Player Haters by Carl Weber
#18 – Purple Panties: An Eroticanoir.com Anthology by Sidney Molare
#19 – Stackin’ Paper by Joy King
#20 – Children of the Street: An Inspector Darko Dawson Mystery by Kwei Quartey
#21 – The Upper Room by Mary Monroe
#22 Thug Matrimony by Wahida Clark
#23 – Thugs And The Women Who Love Them by Wahida Clark
#24 – Married Men by Carl Weber
#25 – I Dreamt I Was in Heaven – The Rampage of the Rufus Buck Gang by Leonce Gaiter
#1 – Malcolm X: A Life of Reinvention by Manning Marable #2 – Confessions of a Video Vixen by Karrine Steffans #3 – Dear G-Spot: Straight Talk About Sex and Love by Zane #4 – Letters to a Young Brother: MANifest Your Destiny by Hill Harper #5 – Peace from Broken Pieces: How to Get Through What You’re Going Through by Iyanla Vanzant #6 – Selected Writings and Speeches of Marcus Garvey by Marcus Garvey #7 – The Ebony Cookbook: A Date with a Dish by Freda DeKnight #8 – The Isis Papers: The Keys to the Colors by Frances Cress Welsing #9 – The Mis-Education of the Negro by Carter Godwin Woodson
#10 – John Henrik Clarke and the Power of Africana History by Ahati N. N. Toure
#11 – Fail Up: 20 Lessons on Building Success from Failure by Tavis Smiley
#12 –The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness by Michelle Alexander
#13 – The Black Male Handbook: A Blueprint for Life by Kevin Powell
#14 – The Other Wes Moore: One Name, Two Fates by Wes Moore
#15 – Why Men Fear Marriage: The Surprising Truth Behind Why So Many Men Can’t Commit by RM Johnson
#16 – Black Titan: A.G. Gaston and the Making of a Black American Millionaire by Carol Jenkins
#17 – Brainwashed: Challenging the Myth of Black Inferiority by Tom Burrell
#18 – A New Earth: Awakening to Your Life’s Purpose by Eckhart Tolle
#19 – John Oliver Killens: A Life of Black Literary Activism by Keith Gilyard
#20 – Alain L. Locke: The Biography of a Philosopher by Leonard Harris
#21 – Age Ain’t Nothing but a Number: Black Women Explore Midlife by Carleen Brice
#22 – 2012 Guide to Literary Agents by Chuck Sambuchino #23 – Chicken Soup for the Prisoner’s Soul by Tom Lagana #24 – 101 Things Every Boy/Young Man of Color Should Know by LaMarr Darnell Shields
#25 – Beyond the Black Lady: Sexuality and the New African American Middle Class by Lisa B. Thompson
* * * * *
This book explodes several myths: that selling sex is completely different from any other kind of work, that migrants who sell sex are passive victims and that the multitude of people out to save them are without self-interest. Laura Agustín makes a passionate case against these stereotypes, arguing that the label ‘trafficked’ does not accurately describe migrants’ lives and that the ‘rescue industry’ serves to disempower them. Based on extensive research amongst both migrants who sell sex and social helpers, Sex at the Margins provides a radically different analysis. Frequently, says Agustin, migrants make rational choices to travel and work in the sex industry, and although they are treated like a marginalised group they form part of the dynamic global economy. Both powerful and controversial, this book is essential reading for all those who want to understand the increasingly important relationship between sex markets, migration and the desire for social justice.
“Sex at the Margins rips apart distinctions between migrants, service work and sexual labour and reveals the utter complexity of the contemporary sex industry. This book is set to be a trailblazer in the study of sexuality.”Lisa Adkins, University of London
* * * * *
By Isabel Wilkerson
Ida Mae Brandon Gladney, a sharecropper’s wife, left Mississippi for Milwaukee in 1937, after her cousin was falsely accused of stealing a white man’s turkeys and was almost beaten to death. In 1945, George Swanson Starling, a citrus picker, fled Florida for Harlem after learning of the grove owners’ plans to give him a “necktie party” (a lynching). Robert Joseph Pershing Foster made his trek from Louisiana to California in 1953, embittered by “the absurdity that he was doing surgery for the United States Army and couldn’t operate in his own home town.” Anchored to these three stories is Pulitzer Prizewinning journalist Wilkerson’s magnificent, extensively researched study of the “great migration,” the exodus of six million black Southerners out of the terror of Jim Crow to an “uncertain existence” in the North and Midwest.
Wilkerson deftly incorporates sociological and historical studies into the novelistic narratives of Gladney, Starling, and Pershing settling in new lands, building anew, and often finding that they have not left racism behind. The drama, poignancy, and romance of a classic immigrant saga pervade this book, hold the reader in its grasp, and resonate long after the reading is done.
* * * * *
By Glenn C. Loury
In this pithy discussion, renowned scholars debate the American penal system through the lensand as a legacyof an ugly and violent racial past. Economist Loury argues that incarceration rises even as crime rates fall because we have become increasingly punitive. According to Loury, the disproportionately black and brown prison populations are the victims of civil rights opponents who successfully moved the country’s race dialogue to a seemingly race-neutral concern over crime. Loury’s claims are well-supported with genuinely shocking statistics, and his argument is compelling that even if the racial argument about causes is inconclusive, the racial consequences are clear.
Three shorter essays respond: Stanford law professor Karlan examines prisoners as an inert ballast in redistricting and voting practices; French sociologist Wacquant argues that the focus on race has ignored the fact that inmates are first and foremost poor people; and Harvard philosophy professor
Shelby urges citizens to break with Washington’s political outlook on race. The group’s respectful sparring results in an insightful look at the conflicting theories of race and incarceration, and the slim volume keeps up the pace of the argument without being overwhelming.Publishers Weekly
* * * * *
By Charlayne Hunter-Gault
A personal history of the civil rights movement from activist and acclaimed journalist Charlayne Hunter-Gault. On January 20, 2009, 1.8 million people crowded the grounds of the Capitol to witness the inauguration of Barack Obama. Among the masses was Charlayne Hunter-Gault. She had flown from South Africa for the occasion, to witness what was for many the culmination of the long struggle for civil rights in the United States. In this compelling personal history, she uses the event to look back on her own involvement in the civil rights movement, as one of two black students who forced the University of Georgia to integrate, and to relate the pivotal events that swept the South as the movement gathered momentum through the early 1960s. With poignant black-and-white photos, original articles from the New York Times, and a unique personal viewpoint, this is a moving tribute to the men and women on whose shoulders Obama stood.
* * * * *
From The World and Africa, 1965
* * * * *
* * * * *
If you like this page consider making a donation
online through PayPal
* * * * *
Browse all issues
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
* * * * *
update 10 July 2012